David Garfinkel's World Copywriting Newsletter,  December 2006

   Homage to the Bard
As Web 2.0 Sweeps Our World,
The Inventor of Print 1.0
Has Some Things To Tell You.

Hey! If The Geniuses of Web 1.0 Had Known This, There Wouldn't Have Been A Dot-Bomb.  So Listen

 
Cartoon by Jim Siergey

San Francisco
December  2006

Two weeks ago I was doing some research for a new product and I needed authoritative quotes to set the stage early on.  The first name that popped to mind was the great David Ogilvy, one of my few heroes who has made a mark in traditional, big-agency advertising.

The link on his name, above, will lead you to an interesting Wikipedia article on his legendary life and times.  This special issue of The World Copywriting Newsletter is focused completely on his wisdom.

I decided to call Mr. Ogilvy "The Bard of Advertising" because he was far more than a technician.  Influences like John Caples and Claude Hopkins understood and passed along the techniques brilliantly, but there was a certain poetry and appreciation of life beyond advertising that I never saw in their work.

Mr. Ogilvy was different.  He had worked as a chef.  He knew the nuances caused by tiniest shades of spices, the relative effect of one part of the meal on the experience as a whole, and the importance of managing, motivating and inspiring the team that cooked the meal.

He truly tasted life and he saw the big picture.

For that reason, I believe, his quotations were more profound and eternal than anyone else's I have ever read, when the subject is advertising and copywriting.

So for this edition, I have picked five quotes and offer you a New Millennium perspective on them.  But don't be surprised if you find in my commentary that things have changed over the last few decades less than you thought they had.

Oh, by the way:  As an added bonus to this tribute, I was able to get some personal reminiscences about Mr. Ogilvy from Drayton Bird, a former partner about whom Mr. Ogilvy once said, "[he] knows more about direct marketing than anyone in the world."

That section comes after the five quotes and my commentary.  Now, here it is:


"A good advertisement is one which sells the product without drawing attention to itself."

This sounds odd, because if you don't get a prospect's attention, how are you going to sell anything?

Here's the underlying point:  I was guest-speaking a few years ago at a local college about advertising, the day after the Clio awards (the advertising industry's warm personal gesture to itself, where they acknowledge each other for the print ads and commercials that lost the largest amounts of money for their clients, I think).

I mentioned to the students that some of the ads were interesting, but none had any emotional impact on me except one, which made me hungry.

A kid in the back of the room who looked like he had been sleeping suddenly sprang to life.

"You mean the McDonald's commercial?" he said.

I nodded.  Apparently he had had the same experience.

Oh, here's the kicker:  The McDonald's ad wasn't an award winner.  It was one of the commercials sponsoring the show itself.

And here's the point:

It wasn't clever.

It wasn't hilarious.

It wasn't even memorable.  (Today, I can't remember what it was about. )

All it did was sell.

Not good enough for the Clios.  But...

... say what you will about trans fats...

... in the last five years, McDonald's' stock is up 35%.

And people keep buying those Big Macs.


"If it doesn't sell, it isn't creative."

Hmm.

I wonder if people at agencies have ever taken a deep breath, focused, and asked themselves this question:

What is it that we're trying to create here?

If the answer is something besides sales and profits, then advertising starts to look like an expense rather than an investment.

The kind of copywriting I preach and practice involves getting results -- measurable, tangible and always leading towards a sale.

To me, that's what Mr. Ogilvy had in mind with this quote.


"The headline is the 'ticket on the meat.'  Use it to flag down readers who are prospects for the kind of product you are advertising."

That's brilliant.  In its simplicity.

What you're really doing with your headline, then, is separating out the readers who would be interested in what you are selling from those wouldn't.

If they aren't prospects for what you sell, you don't want them reading your ad.  Period.

Too many advertisers try to be all things to all people.

Their ads don't make any money.


"I don't know the rules of grammar... If you're trying to persuade people to do something, or buy something, it seems to me you should use their language, the language they use every day, the language in which they think.  We try to write in the vernacular."

Easier said than done, but highly important.

Why is it so hard for so many of us to write the way we speak?

Because we've had it beaten out of us repeatedly, from kindergarten, through high school, college and sometimes grad school.

We've been criticized so many times for not following an artificially rigid writing format that we've internalized the critic.

But... that critic has been working overtime.  The critic needs to go on vacation when you're writing copy.


"Never stop testing, and your advertising will never stop improving."

This comes down to elementary common sense.

If one headline gets you twice the response as the other, which headline do you want to use?

If one price increases your gross profits and your profit margin by more than 30% each, which price do you want to use?

Now.  Now that you know which kind of headline and which kind of price you want to use, how are you going to find out which ones they are?

Only one way.  Testing.


Special Bonus:
Drayton Bird Remembers

Drayton Bird sold his business to Ogilvy and Mather, David Ogilvy's agency, and became head of Ogilvy Direct Worldwide.

I asked him to share some memories of Mr. Ogilvy, and he emailed me these:


1. Suffering no fools

At a meeting in Barcelona somebody showed him an ad he hated - and he said so.

 
The man (unwisely) said, "Well, it did very well."
 
David said, witheringly, "Imagine how much better it would have sold if you'd done it properly."
 
He was terrifying if he thought people were

a) stupid or

b) brown-nosers.


2. Taking it as well as dishing it out

My first working contact was when a director at O & M asked me to comment on a piece of copy for the World Wildlife Fund.
 
I said it was good, but lacked a call to action.
 
I wrote: "David says ads without headlines are headless wonders. This is a tail-less wonder."
 
Next day David rang me from Switzerland, where they had a house.
 
"I wrote that ad, and you were quite right. I'll revise it."

He knew I would have shaded my views if I'd known it was his copy.


3. Endless Room For Improvement

21 years ago I wrote the attached ad. Please note the PS.
 
The job was a bit of a nightmare because after drafting it I had a flight from Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to Toronto, where I got off the plane to do a seminar to our staff there.
 
That is some flight -  halfway round the world from south to north.
 
So I was half dead, but I had to drop my bags, shower, then get talking. Before I began London called: Could I change the ad to say we also needed creative people?
 
"I have to do a seminar now - but I'll call you back afterwards."
 
Somehow my unconscious mind came up with the P.S. while I was teaching.
 
Eye camera studies show people always look to see who's advertising, just as they look to see who signs a letter.
 
It was a 50th of the space, but got 16% of the responses - and the ad attracted three people who all became directors of the agency, and later multi-millionaires when they set up on their own.
 
I showed D.O. the ad with some pride.
 
He just said: "You should have said how many people you wanted - then people would see how fast your agency is growing."
 
An Indian colleague of mine who David called "the most able man" in O & M worldwide used to say, "The obvious is always overlooked."

That is a good example, because I certainly knew all about the virtues of precision, but hadn't thought of applying them there.

 
Nevertheless I'm quite pleased with that ugly little ad.

click on ad to see larger image


That wraps up this edition of the World Copywriting Newsletter.

Until next time,

David Garfinkel

______________________________

By the way, you may forward the URL of this newsletter to anyone you like.  Just cut and paste this link into an email:

http://www.world-copywriting-institute.com/ogilvy

Or, if someone forwarded this issue to you, it's easy to get your own subscription. It's free.
Click here.

______________________________

Copyright © 2006 by the World Copywriting Institute, a division of David Garfinkel, LLC

All Rights Reserved.  Duplication Prohibited without Written Permission, except email forwarding of URL as noted above.

World Copywriting Institute
David Garfinkel, LLC
236 West Portal Ave., #255
San Francisco, CA 94127 USA
www.world-copywriting-institute.com
email: david@davidgarfinkel.com

blog: http://www.world-copywriting-institute.com/blog

To subscribe to this newsletter, click here

------------------------


David Ogilvy
1911-1999

Thank you, Drayton Bird, for the photo